On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:16:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:43:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015,
On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:43:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> > On Tue,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:43:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:41:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Prefer inclusive ranges for revision checks rather than "below B0". Per
> >> specs A2 is
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:43 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:41:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Prefer inclusive ranges for revision checks rather than "below
> > > B0". Per
> > > specs A2
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:41:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Prefer inclusive ranges for revision checks rather than "below B0". Per
> specs A2 is not used, so revid <= A1 matches revid < B0.
The w/a db would say UNTIL_B0 etc., so might be easier to check against
it if we keep to the same
Prefer inclusive ranges for revision checks rather than "below B0". Per
specs A2 is not used, so revid <= A1 matches revid < B0.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h| 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c| 2 +-
On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:41:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Prefer inclusive ranges for revision checks rather than "below B0". Per
>> specs A2 is not used, so revid <= A1 matches revid < B0.
>
> The w/a db would say