On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:40 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:50:34PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > EHL do not support 648 and 652.8 MHz.
>
> You should modify the max_cdclk() function instead. I think that
> along
> should be sufficient.
Okay and it makes the p
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:50:34PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
>> EHL do not support 648 and 652.8 MHz.
>
> You should modify the max_cdclk() function instead. I think that along
> should be sufficient.
Side note, these "if (foo) len--;" constru
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:50:34PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> EHL do not support 648 and 652.8 MHz.
You should modify the max_cdclk() function instead. I think that along
should be sufficient.
>
> BSpec: 20598
> Cc: Clint Taylor
> Cc: Matt Roper
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souz
EHL do not support 648 and 652.8 MHz.
BSpec: 20598
Cc: Clint Taylor
Cc: Matt Roper
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk
