Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend.

2016-02-15 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 09-02-16 om 15:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:05:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 09-02-16 om 14:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä: >>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Instead of duplicating the functionality now that we no longer

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend.

2016-02-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:05:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 09-02-16 om 14:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Instead of duplicating the functionality now that we no longer need > >> to preserve dpll state we can move

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend.

2016-02-09 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 09-02-16 om 14:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Instead of duplicating the functionality now that we no longer need >> to preserve dpll state we can move to using the upstream suspend helper. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend.

2016-02-09 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Instead of duplicating the functionality now that we no longer need to preserve dpll state we can move to using the upstream suspend helper. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for suspend.

2016-02-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:52:22PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Instead of duplicating the functionality now that we no longer need > to preserve dpll state we can move to using the upstream suspend helper. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > --- >