Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm: Convert drm_framebuffer_remove to atomic, v4.

2017-02-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Instead of trying to do everything in 1 go, just do a basic safe > > conversion first. We've been bitten by too many regressions in the > > past. > > > > This patch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm: Convert drm_framebuffer_remove to atomic, v4.

2017-02-23 Thread Sean Paul
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Instead of trying to do everything in 1 go, just do a basic safe > conversion first. We've been bitten by too many regressions in the > past. > > This patch only converts drm_framebuffer_remove to atomic. The > regression

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm: Convert drm_framebuffer_remove to atomic, v4.

2017-02-21 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Instead of trying to do everything in 1 go, just do a basic safe conversion first. We've been bitten by too many regressions in the past. This patch only converts drm_framebuffer_remove to atomic. The regression sensitive part is split out to a separate patch. v2: - Remove plane->fb assignment,