On Tue, 02 Aug 2016, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-08-01 at 19:57 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:38:53PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
>> >
>> > We currently have a mix of struct device *device, struct device *kdev,
>> > and struct device *dev (the latter forcing
On ma, 2016-08-01 at 19:57 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:38:53PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> >
> > We currently have a mix of struct device *device, struct device *kdev,
> > and struct device *dev (the latter forcing us to refer to
> > struct drm_device as something e
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:38:53PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> We currently have a mix of struct device *device, struct device *kdev,
> and struct device *dev (the latter forcing us to refer to
> struct drm_device as something else than the normal dev).
>
> To simplify things, always use kdev
We currently have a mix of struct device *device, struct device *kdev,
and struct device *dev (the latter forcing us to refer to
struct drm_device as something else than the normal dev).
To simplify things, always use kdev when referring to struct device.
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall
---
driv
