On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:46:00PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:38:18AM +, O'Rourke, Tom wrote:
> > > >+static void gen8_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev) {
> > > >+struct drm_i91
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:38:18AM +, O'Rourke, Tom wrote:
> > >+static void gen8_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev) {
> > >+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > >+
> > >+ I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTR
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:38:18AM +, O'Rourke, Tom wrote:
> >+static void gen8_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev) {
> >+struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >+
> >+I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0x);
>
> [TOR:] Please note that for Broadwell, bit 31
>+static void gen8_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev) {
>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>+
>+ I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0x);
[TOR:] Please note that for Broadwell, bit 31 in GEN6_PMINTRMSK is not an
interrupt disable bit.
In "drm/i915: Enabl
From: Ben Widawsky
Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary
difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since
interrupts are not shared in the same way.
The patch is mostly a copy-paste of the existing snb+ code, with updates
to the relevant parts requ
