Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step

2020-06-05 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-06-05 16:27:26) > > On 05/06/2020 10:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Over the next couple of patches, we will want to lock all the modified > > vma for relocation processing under a single ww_mutex. We neither want > > to have to include the vma that are skipped (due to no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step

2020-06-05 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 05/06/2020 10:58, Chris Wilson wrote: Over the next couple of patches, we will want to lock all the modified vma for relocation processing under a single ww_mutex. We neither want to have to include the vma that are skipped (due to no modifications required) nor do we want those to be marked

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/gem: Separate reloc validation into an earlier step

2020-06-05 Thread Chris Wilson
Over the next couple of patches, we will want to lock all the modified vma for relocation processing under a single ww_mutex. We neither want to have to include the vma that are skipped (due to no modifications required) nor do we want those to be marked as written too. So separate out the reloc va