Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915/drm/guc: Don't pass CTB while writing

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:08 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: On 1/15/20 6:08 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass it to the write function. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915/drm/guc: Don't pass CTB while writing

On 1/15/20 6:08 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass it to the write function. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 13 +++-- 1 file

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] i915/drm/guc: Don't pass CTB while writing

Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass it to the write function. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff