Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-02-11 14:50:08)
> Chris Wilson writes:
> > + /* Release the hounds! */
> > + slot[0] = 1;
> > + wmb();
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
> > + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 2;
> > +
> > +
Chris Wilson writes:
> Originally, I did not expect having to rewind a context upon
> timeslicing: the point was to replace the executing context with an idle
I think you said 'non executing' and it would fit better.
> one! However, given a second context that depends on requests from the
>
Originally, I did not expect having to rewind a context upon
timeslicing: the point was to replace the executing context with an idle
one! However, given a second context that depends on requests from the
first, we may have to split the requests along the first context to
execute the second,
