[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-01-08 Thread akash . goel
From: Akash Goel There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because as somehow the start/base location of the Parent region of Stolen area which is PCI Bus :00 is not coinciding with the start of Stolen area and is confl

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-01-13 Thread akash . goel
From: Akash Goel There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because some BIOS are wrapping the stolen area in the root PCI bus, but have an off-by-one error. As a workaround we retry the reservation with an offset of 1 inste

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-18 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:03 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed. > > 1. I've just sent out the merge confirmation mail minutes ago. > 2. Please _never_ drop mailin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:03 +0100 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote: >> > Hi Daniel, >> > >> > Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed. >> >> 1. I've just sent out the merge confirmat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-26 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530 akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve > the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because > some BIOS are wrapping the stolen area in the root PCI bus, but have > an off-by-o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530 > akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > >> From: Akash Goel >> >> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve >> the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because >> some BIOS are wrapping the sto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530 >> akash.g...@intel.com wrote: >> >>> From: Akash Goel >>> >>> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve >>> the physical space used for the stolen area.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > I'm going to need a Reviewed-by and preferrably a Tested-by on this. I really didn't like this patch because requesting a region other than the one we use is morally equivalent to not requesting a region at all. The approach I would pr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-02-28 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> I'm going to need a Reviewed-by and preferrably a Tested-by on this. > > I really didn't like this patch because requesting a region other than > the one we use is morally equivalent to not r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-03-03 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:01:08 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530 > >> akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > >> > >>> From: Akash Goel > >>> > >>> There is a conflict seen when requestin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-03-03 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:14:09 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:01:08 +0200 > Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530 > > >> akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > > >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-03-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > I'm keeping Akash's patch in -fixes for now as I've already pushed it > there. Frankly, I'm inclined to queuing that one for 3.14 and fixing > this right for 3.15, as it's a broken BIOS we're talking about, but I > could be convinced otherwise. Particularl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-01-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:00:28AM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote: > From: Akash Goel > > There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve > the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because > as somehow the start/base location of the Parent region > of Stolen area whi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Resolving the memory region conflict for Stolen area

2014-01-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed. 1. I've just sent out the merge confirmation mail minutes ago. 2. Please _never_ drop mailing lists when poking me (or in general, really). See the internally docum