On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> I'm keeping Akash's patch in -fixes for now as I've already pushed it
> there. Frankly, I'm inclined to queuing that one for 3.14 and fixing
> this right for 3.15, as it's a broken BIOS we're talking about, but I
> could be convinced otherwise. Particularl
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:14:09 -0800
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:01:08 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
> > >> akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> > >>
>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:01:08 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
> >> akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Akash Goel
> >>>
> >>> There is a conflict seen when requestin
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> I'm going to need a Reviewed-by and preferrably a Tested-by on this.
>
> I really didn't like this patch because requesting a region other than
> the one we use is morally equivalent to not r
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> I'm going to need a Reviewed-by and preferrably a Tested-by on this.
I really didn't like this patch because requesting a region other than
the one we use is morally equivalent to not requesting a region at all.
The approach I would pr
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
>> akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
>>
>>> From: Akash Goel
>>>
>>> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
>>> the physical space used for the stolen area.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
> akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
>
>> From: Akash Goel
>>
>> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
>> the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
>> some BIOS are wrapping the sto
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:25:21 +0530
akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Akash Goel
>
> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
> the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
> some BIOS are wrapping the stolen area in the root PCI bus, but have
> an off-by-o
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:03 +0100
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote:
>> > Hi Daniel,
>> >
>> > Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed.
>>
>> 1. I've just sent out the merge confirmat
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:14:03 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed.
>
> 1. I've just sent out the merge confirmation mail minutes ago.
> 2. Please _never_ drop mailin
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Goel, Akash wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please let us know about this patch, will this be up-streamed.
1. I've just sent out the merge confirmation mail minutes ago.
2. Please _never_ drop mailing lists when poking me (or in general,
really). See the internally docum
From: Akash Goel
There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
some BIOS are wrapping the stolen area in the root PCI bus, but have
an off-by-one error. As a workaround we retry the reservation with an
offset of 1 inste
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:00:28AM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Akash Goel
>
> There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
> the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
> as somehow the start/base location of the Parent region
> of Stolen area whi
From: Akash Goel
There is a conflict seen when requesting the kernel to reserve
the physical space used for the stolen area. This is because
as somehow the start/base location of the Parent region
of Stolen area which is PCI Bus :00 is not coinciding with
the start of Stolen area and is confl
14 matches
Mail list logo
