Em Sex, 2016-11-18 às 16:32 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:17:06PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Em Qui, 2016-11-17 às 21:43 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em Ter,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Ter, 2016-11-08 às 16:47 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> escreveu:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> > as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that hap
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:17:06PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Qui, 2016-11-17 às 21:43 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > >
> > > Em Ter, 2016-11-08 às 16:47 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > >
Em Qui, 2016-11-17 às 21:43 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Em Ter, 2016-11-08 às 16:47 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > escreveu:
> > >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > As I told people in [1] we really should
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:09:38PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Ter, 2016-11-08 às 16:47 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> escreveu:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> > as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that hap
Em Ter, 2016-11-08 às 16:47 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
escreveu:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that happened nonetheless,
> so
> let's fix it up by splitting the two into two en
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:53:20PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:47:12PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> > as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that hap
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:47:12PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that happened nonetheless, so
> let's fix it up by splitting the two into two
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:26:31PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:47:12PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> > as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that h
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:47:12PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
> as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that happened nonetheless, so
> let's fix it up by splitting the two into two
From: Ville Syrjälä
As I told people in [1] we really should not be confusing enum plane
as a per-pipe plane identifier. Looks like that happened nonetheless, so
let's fix it up by splitting the two into two enums.
We'll also want something we just directly pass to various register
offset macros
11 matches
Mail list logo
