Ok, let´s try to extract something positive out of all this.
OPTION A (Ben´s proposal):
I think the only solution for what Chris is asking for is to implement this
as 1
context per engine, as opposed to 1 context with a context object per
engine. As you correctly stated, I think we all
-Original Message-
From: Volkin, Bradley D
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 8:10 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Chris Wilson; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:35:38AM
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:45:05AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
Ok, let´s try to extract something positive out of all this.
OPTION A (Ben´s proposal):
I think the only solution for what Chris is asking for is to implement this
as 1
context per engine, as opposed to 1 context
-Original Message-
From: Volkin, Bradley D
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:01 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:37:44AM -0700
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made intel_lrc.c
self-contained, as Daniel requested. What if we need to execute commands from
somewhere else, like in intel_gen7_queue_flip()?
And this takes me to
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:14 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made intel_lrc.c self-
contained, as Daniel requested. What if we need to execute commands from
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:27 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
ring submission mechanism
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
wrote:
So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:42 PM
To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
submission mechanism
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
ring submission mechanism
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:18:35PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson
Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
ring submission mechanism
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:18:35PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
Well, new-ish: if all this code looks familiar, that's because it's
a clone of the existing submission mechanism (with some modifications
here and there to adapt it to LRCs and Execlists).
And why did we do this? Execlists offer several advantages, like
13 matches
Mail list logo
