Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't assume primary cursor are always on for wm calculation (v3)

2015-03-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: Current ILK-style watermark code assumes the primary plane and cursor plane are always enabled. This assumption, along with the combination of two independent commits that got merged at the same time, results in a NULL dereference.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't assume primary cursor are always on for wm calculation (v3)

2015-03-09 Thread Matt Roper
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: Current ILK-style watermark code assumes the primary plane and cursor plane are always enabled. This assumption, along with the combination of two independent commits

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't assume primary cursor are always on for wm calculation (v3)

2015-03-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:48:08AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:19:25AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: Current ILK-style watermark code assumes the primary plane and cursor plane are always enabled. This

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't assume primary cursor are always on for wm calculation (v3)

2015-03-09 Thread Matt Roper
Current ILK-style watermark code assumes the primary plane and cursor plane are always enabled. This assumption, along with the combination of two independent commits that got merged at the same time, results in a NULL dereference. The offending commits are: commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't assume primary cursor are always on for wm calculation (v3)

2015-03-09 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 5919 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied PNV