On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:19:09AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:28:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Currently we are always switching to the idle pattern after the
> >
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Currently we are always switching to the idle pattern after the
> > link training, but we don't always wait for the minimum number
> > of idl
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently we are always switching to the idle pattern after the
> link training, but we don't always wait for the minimum number
> of idle patterns sent. That doesn't look to be what Bspec
> asks of us.
>
>
From: Ville Syrjälä
Currently we are always switching to the idle pattern after the
link training, but we don't always wait for the minimum number
of idle patterns sent. That doesn't look to be what Bspec
asks of us.
According to bspec what we should do is switch to idle pattern
and wait for it
