Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor.

2011-11-13 Thread Zhigang Gong
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:55 PM > To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects > to glamor. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor.

2011-11-11 Thread Chris Wilson
ject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and > polyfillrects > > to glamor. > > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:31:21 +0800, Zhigang Gong > > wrote: > > > If GLAMOR is enabled, we route UXA's fillspans and polyfillrects to > > > glamor by d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor.

2011-11-11 Thread Zhigang Gong
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 5:08 PM > To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects > to glamor. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor.

2011-11-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:31:21 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote: > If GLAMOR is enabled, we route UXA's fillspans and > polyfillrects to glamor by default. And if glamor > fail to accelerate it, UXA continue to handle it. How is serialisation handled between the UXA and glamor acceleration routines? Don'

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] glamor: Route fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor.

2011-11-11 Thread Zhigang Gong
If GLAMOR is enabled, we route UXA's fillspans and polyfillrects to glamor by default. And if glamor fail to accelerate it, UXA continue to handle it. Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong --- uxa/uxa-accel.c | 13 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/uxa/uxa-acc