Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Restore GMBUS operation after a failed bit-banging fallback

2016-04-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:50:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > When the GMBUS based i2c transfer times out, we try to fall back to > > bit-banging and retry the operation that way. However if the bit-banging

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Restore GMBUS operation after a failed bit-banging fallback

2016-04-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > When the GMBUS based i2c transfer times out, we try to fall back to > bit-banging and retry the operation that way. However if the bit-banging > attempt also fails, we should probably go back to the GMBUS method fo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Restore GMBUS operation after a failed bit-banging fallback

2016-03-07 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä When the GMBUS based i2c transfer times out, we try to fall back to bit-banging and retry the operation that way. However if the bit-banging attempt also fails, we should probably go back to the GMBUS method for the next attempt. Maybe there simply wasn't anyone one the bus at