At the moment wait_event_timeout/wait_event_interruptible_timeout may
time out 1 jiffy too early, as the calculated expiry time is 1 less than
needed. Besides timing out too early this also means that the
calculation of the remaining time will be incorrect and we will pass a
non-zero remaining time to user space in case of a time out. This is one
reason for the following bugzilla report:

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64270

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index a1a282c..2b51fa7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, 
u32 seqno,
                wait_forever = false;
        }
 
-       timeout_jiffies = timespec_to_jiffies(&wait_time);
+       timeout_jiffies = timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(&wait_time);
 
        if (WARN_ON(!ring->irq_get(ring)))
                return -ENODEV;
-- 
1.8.1.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to