On 05/02/2013 10:48 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for 300MHz pixel clocks, but as
that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
practice, just use the high freq divider all the time.
v2: remove unconditional write (Jesse)
check for
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:52:36AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 05/02/2013 10:48 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for 300MHz pixel clocks, but as
that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
practice, just use the high freq divider all
Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for 300MHz pixel clocks, but as
that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
practice, just use the high freq divider all the time.
v2: remove unconditional write (Jesse)
check for pixel rate properly (Jesse)
v3: give up, the DAC
