On 24 January 2017 at 01:25, Robert Bragg wrote:
> There's no need for the driver to keep reading back the head pointer
> from hardware since the hardware doesn't update it automatically. This
> way we can treat any invalid head pointer value as a software/driver
> bug instead of spurious hardware
There's no need for the driver to keep reading back the head pointer
from hardware since the hardware doesn't update it automatically. This
way we can treat any invalid head pointer value as a software/driver
bug instead of spurious hardware behaviour.
This change is also a small stepping stone to