On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:28:00PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:12:18PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:47:28PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:19:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:12:18PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:47:28PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:19:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:47:28PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:19:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 01/11/2018
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:19:13PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > > Instead of using several IS_GEN(),
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:10:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
> > > range as argument. By code inspection
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:31:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
> > range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
> > necessary for spatch:
> >
> > @@
> >
On 01/11/2018 08:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
necessary for spatch:
@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3, 4)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e,
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
> range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
> necessary for spatch:
Again, ignoring the naming for now, I do like the idea here.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Instead of using several IS_GEN(), it's possible to pass the
range as argument. By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
necessary for spatch:
@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3, 4)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e, 6)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5, 6)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 6) ||
