On 04/02/2021 16:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-04 15:18:31)
On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Whether a scheduler chooses to implement timeslicing is up to it, and
not an underlying property of the HW engine. The scheduler does depend
on the HW supporting
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-04 15:18:31)
>
> On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Whether a scheduler chooses to implement timeslicing is up to it, and
> > not an underlying property of the HW engine. The scheduler does depend
> > on the HW supporting preemption.
>
> Therefore,
On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Whether a scheduler chooses to implement timeslicing is up to it, and
not an underlying property of the HW engine. The scheduler does depend
on the HW supporting preemption.
Therefore, continuing on the comment I made in the previous patch, if we
had
Whether a scheduler chooses to implement timeslicing is up to it, and
not an underlying property of the HW engine. The scheduler does depend
on the HW supporting preemption.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 6 ++
