On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 21:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-06-14 20:58:09)
> > Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-06-14 20:53:26)
> > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 08:11, Chris Wilson
> > > wrote:
> > > > @@ -67,10 +61,17 @@ i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(struct
> > > >
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-06-14 20:58:09)
> Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-06-14 20:53:26)
> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 08:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > @@ -67,10 +61,17 @@ i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(struct
> > > drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool write)
> > > * continue to assume that the
Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-06-14 20:53:26)
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 08:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > @@ -67,10 +61,17 @@ i915_gem_object_set_to_wc_domain(struct
> > drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool write)
> > * continue to assume that the obj remained out of the CPU cached
> > *
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 08:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> In order to allow for asynchronous gathering of pages tracked by the
> obj->resv, we take advantage of pinning the pages before doing waiting
> on the reservation, and where possible do an early wait before acquiring
> the object lock (with a
In order to allow for asynchronous gathering of pages tracked by the
obj->resv, we take advantage of pinning the pages before doing waiting
on the reservation, and where possible do an early wait before acquiring
the object lock (with a follow up locked waited to ensure we have
exclusive access
