Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/48] drm/i915: Clean up VMAs before freeing

2013-12-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:55:05PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:11:23PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/48] drm/i915: Clean up VMAs before freeing

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully unbound but we want to free one VMA of the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/48] drm/i915: Clean up VMAs before freeing

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully unbound but we want to free one VMA of the