Since request can be unsubmitted, we need to avoid overriding its priority
during submission. Otherwise we won't be able to resubmit it with
correct priority.

v2: Limit DFS by excluding completed requests (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c           | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 4c853fb7..e53d867 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                        }
 
                        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->priotree.link);
-                       rq->priotree.priority = INT_MAX;
 
                        __i915_gem_request_submit(rq);
                        trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, port_index(port, engine));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 5d4f23c..1255724 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -487,7 +487,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine)
                        }
 
                        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->priotree.link);
-                       rq->priotree.priority = INT_MAX;
 
                        __i915_gem_request_submit(rq);
                        trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, port_index(port, engine));
@@ -771,9 +770,17 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request 
*request, int prio)
                 * engines.
                 */
                list_for_each_entry(p, &pt->signalers_list, signal_link) {
+                       struct drm_i915_gem_request *s =
+                               container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*s), priotree);
+
                        GEM_BUG_ON(p->signaler->priority < pt->priority);
-                       if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
-                               list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
+                       if (prio <= READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
+                               continue;
+
+                       if (i915_gem_request_completed(s))
+                               continue;
+
+                       list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
                }
 
                list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
-- 
2.9.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to