Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Use the default 600ns LDO programming sequence delay

2015-05-08 Thread Deepak S
On Friday 08 May 2015 06:52 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +0530, Deepak S wrote: On Friday 10 April 2015 08:51 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com Not sure which LDO programming sequence delay should be

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Use the default 600ns LDO programming sequence delay

2015-05-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +0530, Deepak S wrote: On Friday 10 April 2015 08:51 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com Not sure which LDO programming sequence delay should be used for the CHV PHY, but the spec says that 600ns

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Use the default 600ns LDO programming sequence delay

2015-05-08 Thread Deepak S
On Friday 10 April 2015 08:51 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com Not sure which LDO programming sequence delay should be used for the CHV PHY, but the spec says that 600ns is Used by default for initial bringup, and the BIOS seems to use