On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:44 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>
> On 2022-01-27 00:29:37 [+0100], Mario Kleiner wrote:
> > Hi, first thank you for implementing these preempt disables according to
> Hi Mario,
>
> > the markers i left long ago. And sorry for the rather late reply.
> >
> > I had a
On 2022-01-27 00:29:37 [+0100], Mario Kleiner wrote:
> Hi, first thank you for implementing these preempt disables according to
Hi Mario,
> the markers i left long ago. And sorry for the rather late reply.
>
> I had a look at the code, as of Linux 5.16, and did also a little test run
> (of a stan
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:03 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <
bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> From: Mike Galbraith
>
> Mario Kleiner suggest in commit
> ad3543ede630f ("drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into
> kms driver.")
>
> a spots where preemption should be disabled on PREE
From: Mike Galbraith
Mario Kleiner suggest in commit
ad3543ede630f ("drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into kms
driver.")
a spots where preemption should be disabled on PREEMPT_RT. The
difference is that on PREEMPT_RT the intel_uncore::lock disables neither
preemption nor in