[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/71] drm/i915/chv: Implement WaDisableSamplerPowerBypass for CHV

2014-04-09 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Rafael Barbalho Cherryview also needs this WA. Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho [vsyrjala: Looks like it's for pre-prodution hw only] Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/71] drm/i915/chv: Implement WaDisableSamplerPowerBypass for CHV

2014-04-25 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-09 7:28 GMT-03:00 : > From: Rafael Barbalho > > Cherryview also needs this WA. At least on the chv_rebase tree, this WA is implemented for BDW but it is not documented as pre-prod only, and its name is not there. We should probably add a comment documenting the name and the fact that it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/71] drm/i915/chv: Implement WaDisableSamplerPowerBypass for CHV

2014-04-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:55:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-04-09 7:28 GMT-03:00 : > > From: Rafael Barbalho > > > > Cherryview also needs this WA. > > At least on the chv_rebase tree, this WA is implemented for BDW but it > is not documented as pre-prod only, and its name is not there.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/71] drm/i915/chv: Implement WaDisableSamplerPowerBypass for CHV

2014-04-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-04-28 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ville Syrjälä : > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:55:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-04-09 7:28 GMT-03:00 : >> > From: Rafael Barbalho >> > >> > Cherryview also needs this WA. >> >> At least on the chv_rebase tree, this WA is implemented for BDW but it >> is not docum

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/71] drm/i915/chv: Implement WaDisableSamplerPowerBypass for CHV

2014-05-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:19:50PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2014-04-28 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ville Syrjälä : > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:55:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2014-04-09 7:28 GMT-03:00 : > >> > From: Rafael Barbalho > >> > > >> > Cherryview also needs this WA. > >> > >> At least