On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
We could rename the off/on to pre/post_modeset if you like, but then
someone gets to audit all the other drivers. That someone isn't
going to be me.
I appreciate your caution wrt other drivers, but I'm worried that
On 29.05.2014 19:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
We could rename the off/on to pre/post_modeset if you like, but then
someone gets to audit all the other drivers. That someone isn't
going to be me.
I appreciate your caution
Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
When the pre/post-modeset hooks were originally added, it worked like
this: the pre-modeset hook enabled the vblank interrupt, which updated
the
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:12:54PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
When the pre/post-modeset hooks were originally added, it worked like
On 28.05.2014 20:19, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:12:54PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Digging out an ooold post of Daniel's...
On 04.03.2014 18:13, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
When the pre/post-modeset hooks were
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:58:26AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:56:20AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:03:35PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
drm_vblank_off() and
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:03:35PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
drm_vblank_off() and drm_vblank_on() calls, and sprinkle the appropriate
drm_vblank_on()
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:58:26 +0900
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
there simply to make drm_vblank_get() fail during a modeset.
Actually, their
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:48:55PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
there simply to make
On Fre, 2014-02-21 at 21:03 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
We can kill of the drm_vblank_{pre,post}_modeset() calls since those are
there simply to make drm_vblank_get() fail during a modeset.
Actually, their original purpose was to keep the DRM vblank counter
consistent across
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Tell the drm core vblank code to reject drm_vblank_get()s only between
drm_vblank_off() and drm_vblank_on() calls, and sprinkle the appropriate
drm_vblank_on() calls to the .crtc_enable() hooks. At this time I kept
the off calls in their current
13 matches
Mail list logo