On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:31:04PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:31:08PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The other issue is the existing method doesn't rely as much on proper
> > request handling, ie. this could be more resilient to driver bugs. I
> > kind of want to keep b
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:31:08PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The other issue is the existing method doesn't rely as much on proper
> request handling, ie. this could be more resilient to driver bugs. I
> kind of want to keep both...
Actually I think it is. Part of the process of reading an erro
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:45:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 01:47:29PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:55:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05:40AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:4
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:45:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 01:47:29PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:55:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05:40AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:4
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 01:47:29PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:55:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05:40AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:40AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 06:17:4
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 07:55:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05:40AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:40AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 06:17:45PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > The previous check during error
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:05:40AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:40AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 06:17:45PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > The previous check during error capture of whether or not the current VM
> > > should be scanned used
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:47:40AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 06:17:45PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The previous check during error capture of whether or not the current VM
> > should be scanned used, gen < 7. That was more or less trying to
> > determine if there was
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 06:17:45PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The previous check during error capture of whether or not the current VM
> should be scanned used, gen < 7. That was more or less trying to
> determine if there was a full PPGTT. At the time, this was sort of what
> I meant to do becau
The previous check during error capture of whether or not the current VM
should be scanned used, gen < 7. That was more or less trying to
determine if there was a full PPGTT. At the time, this was sort of what
I meant to do because I was more interested in working backwards from
hardware state. How
10 matches
Mail list logo
