On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:38:40AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:54:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > So don't try to store it in the DPLL_FP register.
> >
> > Otherwise it looks like the limits for pineview are correct: It has
> > it's own clock computation code, wh
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:54:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> So don't try to store it in the DPLL_FP register.
>
> Otherwise it looks like the limits for pineview are correct: It has
> it's own clock computation code, which doesn't use an offset for n
> divisors, and the register value based m
So don't try to store it in the DPLL_FP register.
Otherwise it looks like the limits for pineview are correct: It has
it's own clock computation code, which doesn't use an offset for n
divisors, and the register value based m limits look sane enough.
v2: Rebase on top of the pineview clock refact
