Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-02-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi Rob, On 25/01/2022 10:24, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 21/01/2022 11:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 20/01/2022 16:44, Rob Clark wrote: [snip] If there is a tool somewhere that displays this info, that would be useful for testing my implementation. I have a patch to Intel specific

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-25 Thread Christian König
Wow, nice. Certainly +1 from my side to have that generalized, documented and uniform among all drivers. Regards, Christian. Am 25.01.22 um 11:24 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: On 21/01/2022 11:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 20/01/2022 16:44, Rob Clark wrote: [snip] If there is a tool

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-25 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 21/01/2022 11:50, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 20/01/2022 16:44, Rob Clark wrote: [snip] If there is a tool somewhere that displays this info, that would be useful for testing my implementation. I have a patch to Intel specific intel_gpu_top (see

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 20/01/2022 16:44, Rob Clark wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:09 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:55:35PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM drivers. Idea is that a simple but,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-20 Thread Rob Clark
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:09 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:55:35PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM > > drivers. > > > > Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-20 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 19/01/2022 15:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:55:35PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM drivers. Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic userspace

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:55:35PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM > drivers. > > Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic > userspace tools to be written while at the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2022-01-06 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM drivers. Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic userspace tools to be written while at the same time avoiding a more heavy handed approach of adding a mid-layer to DRM.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2021-12-03 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM drivers. Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic userspace tools to be written while at the same time avoiding a more heavy handed approach of adding a mid-layer to DRM.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm: Document fdinfo format specification

2021-09-22 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Proposal to standardise the fdinfo text format as optionally output by DRM drivers. Idea is that a simple but, well defined, spec will enable generic userspace tools to be written while at the same time avoiding a more heavy handed approach of adding a mid-layer to DRM.