On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2017 14:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 05/05/2017 14:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
On 05/05/2017 15:04, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:50:46PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
+#include
+
+static inline void __list_del_many(struct list_head *head,
+ struct list_head *first)
+{
+
On 05/05/2017 14:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 05/05/2017 14:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
struct intel_engine_cs {
@@ -367,6
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:50:46PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >+#include
> >+
> >+static inline void __list_del_many(struct list_head *head,
> >+ struct list_head *first)
> >+{
> >+head->next =
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2017 14:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>struct intel_engine_cs {
> >>>@@ -367,6 +373,7 @@ struct
On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
+#include
+
+static inline void __list_del_many(struct list_head *head,
+ struct list_head *first)
+{
+ head->next = first;
+ first->prev = head;
+}
Btw it is similar to __list_cut_position, but
On 05/05/2017 14:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
struct intel_engine_cs {
@@ -367,6 +373,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
/* Execlists */
struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
+
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > struct intel_engine_cs {
> >@@ -367,6 +373,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> >
> > /* Execlists */
> > struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
> >+struct execlist_priolist
On 03/05/2017 12:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
All the requests at the same priority are executed in FIFO order. They
do not need to be stored in the rbtree themselves, as they are a simple
list within a level. If we move the requests at one priority into a list,
we can then reduce the rbtree to the
All the requests at the same priority are executed in FIFO order. They
do not need to be stored in the rbtree themselves, as they are a simple
list within a level. If we move the requests at one priority into a list,
we can then reduce the rbtree to the set of priorities. This should keep
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
