Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported

2023-10-21 Thread kernel test robot
/drm/drm-tip drm-tip patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010184423.2118908-4-jonathan.cavitt%40intel.com patch subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231021

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported

2023-10-11 Thread kernel test robot
/drm/drm-tip drm-tip patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010184423.2118908-4-jonathan.cavitt%40intel.com patch subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported

2023-10-10 Thread Cavitt, Jonathan
Ignore this. It's not a security hole: it's just a temporary patch I was using for rebasing purposes that got smuggled into this series on accident. It has a bad tag because of some stale gitconfig params that I've since removed. -Jonathan Cavitt -Original Message- From: Cavitt, Jonatha

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH dii-client 2/2] drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported

2023-10-10 Thread Jonathan Cavitt
For platforms supporting selective tlb invalidations, we don't need to do a full tlb invalidation. Rather do a range based tlb invalidation for every unbind of purged vma belongs to an active vm. Signed-off-by: Prathap Kumar Valsan Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura Cc: Fei Yang Signed-off-by: Mauro