Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Make sure we can also use the short form of the subtest options

2013-03-22 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:14:39PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > My original thinking behind only allowing the long option name is to > avoid collisions with cmdline options for the test executable itself. > E.g. when we'd teach testdisplay a few different default runs, but you > could still dig in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Make sure we can also use the short form of the subtest options

2013-03-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > From: Damien Lespiau > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau My original thinking behind only allowing the long option name is to avoid collisions with cmdline options for the test executable itself. E.g. when we'd teach testdisplay a few diffe

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Make sure we can also use the short form of the subtest options

2013-03-21 Thread Damien Lespiau
From: Damien Lespiau Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau --- lib/drmtest.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/drmtest.c b/lib/drmtest.c index 641028c..2d4fc89 100644 --- a/lib/drmtest.c +++ b/lib/drmtest.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ void drmtest_subtest_init(int argc, ch