On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:43:47AM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 30/08/17 10:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Also dapc is not a good testcase name, needs some proper prefixing.
>
>
> Reminds me perf.c should probably be renamed too.
> What would be an appropriate name? intel_perf.c?
I think
Thanks Lionel for the review. Will revamp the testcase.
Thanks
Sagar
On 8/29/2017 2:21 PM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Hi Sagar,
Thanks for writing this test. It looks promising but there are a few
issues that needs to be addressed for this to run in CI.
Please have a look at the comments bel
On 8/30/2017 3:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
One more on top of Lionel's coments.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:23:03PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ bool ret;
+ int option;
+ int platform;
+
+ if (argc != 3) {
+ printf(
On 30/08/17 10:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Also dapc is not a good testcase name, needs some proper prefixing.
Reminds me perf.c should probably be renamed too.
What would be an appropriate name? intel_perf.c?
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.
One more on top of Lionel's coments.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:23:03PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + bool ret;
> + int option;
> + int platform;
> +
> + if (argc != 3) {
> + printf("Usage: \n./dapc \
> + \nPlat
Hi Sagar,
Thanks for writing this test. It looks promising but there are a few
issues that needs to be addressed for this to run in CI.
Please have a look at the comments below.
Thanks!
On 28/08/17 10:53, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
This test verifies different i915 perf sampling options for fi
This test verifies different i915 perf sampling options for fields like
PID, CTX ID, Timestamp, OA Report, TAG, MMIO.
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble
---
tests/Makefile.sources |1 +
tests/dapc.c | 1017 ++
