Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib: Only require we have i915.reset module parameter for allow-hang

2019-02-21 Thread Antonio Argenziano
On 21/02/19 08:11, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2019-02-21 16:08:04) On 21/02/19 02:19, Chris Wilson wrote: To control hang detection, we manipulate the i915.reset module parameter. However, to be nice we should SKIP if we cannot modify the parameter as opposed to outrigh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib: Only require we have i915.reset module parameter for allow-hang

2019-02-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2019-02-21 16:08:04) > > > On 21/02/19 02:19, Chris Wilson wrote: > > To control hang detection, we manipulate the i915.reset module > > parameter. However, to be nice we should SKIP if we cannot modify the > > parameter as opposed to outright FAILing. > > > > Referen

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib: Only require we have i915.reset module parameter for allow-hang

2019-02-21 Thread Antonio Argenziano
On 21/02/19 02:19, Chris Wilson wrote: To control hang detection, we manipulate the i915.reset module parameter. However, to be nice we should SKIP if we cannot modify the parameter as opposed to outright FAILing. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108891 Signed-off-by: C

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib: Only require we have i915.reset module parameter for allow-hang

2019-02-21 Thread Chris Wilson
To control hang detection, we manipulate the i915.reset module parameter. However, to be nice we should SKIP if we cannot modify the parameter as opposed to outright FAILing. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108891 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- lib/igt_gt.c | 4 ++-- 1