Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/perf_pmu: Verify busyness when PMU is enabled after engine got busy

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-10 10:42:34) > > On 09/01/2018 21:28, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-09 16:16:20) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >> > >> Make sure busyness is correctly reported when PMU is enabled after the > >> engine is already busy with a single long batc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/perf_pmu: Verify busyness when PMU is enabled after engine got busy

On 09/01/2018 21:28, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-09 16:16:20) From: Tvrtko Ursulin Make sure busyness is correctly reported when PMU is enabled after the engine is already busy with a single long batch. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- tests/perf_pmu.c | 42 ++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/perf_pmu: Verify busyness when PMU is enabled after engine got busy

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-09 16:16:20) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Make sure busyness is correctly reported when PMU is enabled after the > engine is already busy with a single long batch. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > --- > tests/perf_pmu.c | 42

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/perf_pmu: Verify busyness when PMU is enabled after engine got busy

From: Tvrtko Ursulin Make sure busyness is correctly reported when PMU is enabled after the engine is already busy with a single long batch. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- tests/perf_pmu.c | 42 ++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/