Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Check engine relative registers

2020-02-28 Thread Stimson, Dale B
On 2020-02-28 10:43:37, Chris Wilson wrote: > Some of the non-privileged registers are at the same offset on each > engine. We can improve our coverage for unknown HW layout by using the > reported engine->mmio_base for relative offsets. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Dale B

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Check engine relative registers

2020-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
Some of the non-privileged registers are at the same offset on each engine. We can improve our coverage for unknown HW layout by using the reported engine->mmio_base for relative offsets. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 164 - 1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Check engine relative registers

2020-01-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Some of the non-privileged registers are at the same offset on each engine. We can improve our coverage for unknown HW layout by using the reported engine->mmio_base for relative offsets. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 164 - 1