On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Imre Deak (2018-06-06 19:00:52)
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 06:42:14PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The current method of checking for a failed module load is flawed, as we
> > > only report the error on probing it is not
Quoting Imre Deak (2018-06-06 19:00:52)
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 06:42:14PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The current method of checking for a failed module load is flawed, as we
> > only report the error on probing it is not being reported back by
> > modprobe. So we have to dig inside the
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 06:42:14PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current method of checking for a failed module load is flawed, as we
> only report the error on probing it is not being reported back by
> modprobe. So we have to dig inside the module_parameters while the
> module is still loaded
The current method of checking for a failed module load is flawed, as we
only report the error on probing it is not being reported back by
modprobe. So we have to dig inside the module_parameters while the
module is still loaded to discover the error.
v2: Expect i915.inject_load_failure to be
