Since health checks are now run from follow-up fixture sections, it is
safe to fail subtests without the need to abort the test execution.  Do
that on device close errors instead of emitting warnings.

v2: Rebase on current upstream master.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: MichaƂ Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
 tests/core_hotunplug.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/core_hotunplug.c b/tests/core_hotunplug.c
index 313c44784..a4902eba2 100644
--- a/tests/core_hotunplug.c
+++ b/tests/core_hotunplug.c
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ static void device_unplug(struct hotunplug *priv, const 
char *prefix)
        igt_reset_timeout();
 
        priv->fd.sysfs_dev = local_close(priv->fd.sysfs_dev);
-       igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.sysfs_dev != -1,
-                     "Device sysfs node close failed\n");
+       igt_assert_f(priv->fd.sysfs_dev == -1,
+                    "Device sysfs node close failed\n");
 }
 
 /* Re-discover the device by rescanning its bus */
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static void hotunbind_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
 
        igt_debug("late closing the unbound device instance\n");
        priv->fd.drm = local_close(priv->fd.drm);
-       igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.drm != -1, "Device close failed\n");
+       igt_assert_f(priv->fd.drm == -1, "Device close failed\n");
 }
 
 static void hotunplug_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void hotunplug_lateclose(struct hotunplug *priv)
 
        igt_debug("late closing the removed device instance\n");
        priv->fd.drm = local_close(priv->fd.drm);
-       igt_warn_on_f(priv->fd.drm != -1, "Device close failed\n");
+       igt_assert_f(priv->fd.drm == -1, "Device close failed\n");
 }
 
 /* Main */
-- 
2.21.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to