This is intended to test the scheduler behaviour is correct.
The subtests are
-basic
Tests that batch buffers of the same priority submitted to a ring
execute in the order they are submitted.
-read
Submits a batch buffer with a read dependency to a buffer object to
a ring which is held in the sched
On 02/03/16 20:15, Chris Wilson wrote:
+static struct ring {
+ const char *name;
+ int id;
+ bool exists;
+} rings[] = {
+ { "render", I915_EXEC_RENDER, false },
+ { "bsd1",I915_EXEC_BSD | 1<<13, false },
+ { "bsd2",I915_EXEC_BSD | 2<<13, false },
Thi
> +static struct ring {
> + const char *name;
> + int id;
> + bool exists;
> +} rings[] = {
> + { "render", I915_EXEC_RENDER, false },
> + { "bsd1",I915_EXEC_BSD | 1<<13, false },
> + { "bsd2",I915_EXEC_BSD | 2<<13, false },
This is wrong. The timeline is coupled to
EXEC_BSD | 2<<13
constitute separate exec_id's?
//Derek
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Morton, Derek J
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]
