[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

2017-12-01 Thread Chris Wilson
For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend. This causes a pm_system_wakeup(), causing dpm_suspend() to return -EBUSY. Signed-off-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

2017-12-01 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within > i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard > wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend. > This causes a pm_system_wakeup(),

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

2017-11-30 Thread Chris Wilson
For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend. This causes a pm_system_wakeup(), causing dpm_suspend() to return -EBUSY. Signed-off-by: