On 24 January 2017 at 00:53, Robert Bragg wrote:
> There were a couple of problems with both of these tests that could lead
> to false negatives addressed by this patch.
>
> 1) The upper limit for the number of iterations missed a +1 to consider
>that there might be a sample immediately availa
There were a couple of problems with both of these tests that could lead
to false negatives addressed by this patch.
1) The upper limit for the number of iterations missed a +1 to consider
that there might be a sample immediately available at the start of the
loop.
v2) The tests didn't cons
