[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

2017-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
We have no coverage of sign-extended relocations in BAT, so provide some. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Petri Latvala --- tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

2017-05-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > We have no coverage of sign-extended relocations in BAT, so provide > some. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: Petri Latvala There's a metric ton of simple abi checks we should add to pre-merge testing, adding them all to BAT im

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

2017-05-22 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:03:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > We have no coverage of sign-extended relocations in BAT, so provide > > some. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > > Cc: Petri Latvala > > There's a metric ton of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

2017-05-22 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:03:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > What would probably help the CI folks is a gem testcase list that includes > all the important stuff (so much more than BAT), but also completes in a > reasonable amount of time (2h as a goal might be good). Atm not even > excluding g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Add gem_exec_reloc/basic-range to BAT

2017-05-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:40:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:03:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > What would probably help the CI folks is a gem testcase list that includes > > all the important stuff (so much more than BAT), but also completes in a > > reasonable a