On 9 November 2016 at 16:15, Robert Bragg wrote:
> With v8 of the command parser (where we won't get an EINVAL for an
> access violation) this updates the bitmasks test to explicitly confirm
> that the command became a NOOP by reading back from where the QW_WRITE
> would have otherwise landed.
>
>
With v8 of the command parser (where we won't get an EINVAL for an
access violation) this updates the bitmasks test to explicitly confirm
that the command became a NOOP by reading back from where the QW_WRITE
would have otherwise landed.
Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg
---
tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 1