Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v3 07/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update bitmasks test for v >=8

2016-11-11 Thread Matthew Auld
On 9 November 2016 at 16:15, Robert Bragg wrote: > With v8 of the command parser (where we won't get an EINVAL for an > access violation) this updates the bitmasks test to explicitly confirm > that the command became a NOOP by reading back from where the QW_WRITE > would have otherwise landed. > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v3 07/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update bitmasks test for v >=8

2016-11-09 Thread Robert Bragg
With v8 of the command parser (where we won't get an EINVAL for an access violation) this updates the bitmasks test to explicitly confirm that the command became a NOOP by reading back from where the QW_WRITE would have otherwise landed. Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg --- tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 1