On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 01:35:31)
> > The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
> > were left defined. The rest can be gone and then we just use the kernel
> > defines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 01:35:31)
> The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
> were left defined. The rest can be gone and then we just use the kernel
> defines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi
> ---
> intel/intel_chipset.c | 5 ++
> intel/intel_chipset
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 17:01:11)
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:32:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 01:35:31)
> > > The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
> > > were left defined.
> >
> > What makes them so special? Why
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:32:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 01:35:31)
> > The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
> > were left defined.
>
> What makes them so special? Why not just match on the override devid?
because it's a name
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2018-08-29 01:35:31)
> The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
> were left defined.
What makes them so special? Why not just match on the override devid?
-Chris
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@list
The 2 PCI IDs that are used for the command line overrid mechanism
were left defined. The rest can be gone and then we just use the kernel
defines.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi
---
intel/intel_chipset.c | 5 ++
intel/intel_chipset.h | 187 +-
2 files c
