Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-12 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > The purpose of this series is to: > ... > - Move arch-specific shadow ROM location knowledge, e.g., > 0xC-0xD, from PCI core to arch code. > ... > Bjorn Helgaas (12): > PCI: Mark shadow copy of VGA ROM as IORESOU

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-11 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> FWIW, if I disable all the checks in pci_get_rom_size, I learn that my >> video ROM consists entirely of 0xff bytes. Maybe there just isn't a >> ROM shadow on my laptop. > > I t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > FWIW, if I disable all the checks in pci_get_rom_size, I learn that my > video ROM consists entirely of 0xff bytes. Maybe there just isn't a > ROM shadow on my laptop. I think most laptops end up having the graphics ROM be part of the r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-11 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:09PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> The purpose of this series is to: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-11 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:16:09PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> The purpose of this series is to: > >> > >> - Fix the "BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus align

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-11 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> The purpose of this series is to: >> >> - Fix the "BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment" >> messages reported by Linus [1], Andy [2], and others. >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-08 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:53:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > The purpose of this series is to: > > - Fix the "BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment" > messages reported by Linus [1], Andy [2], and others. > > - Move arch-specific shadow ROM location knowledge, e.g., >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > The purpose of this series is to: > [ .. ] The patches look ok to me and seem to make sense. Of course, let's see what they break. Hopefully nothing, but any time the PCI resource code changes I get a bit worried. PTSD, I guess.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/12] PCI: Rework shadow ROM handling

2016-03-03 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
The purpose of this series is to: - Fix the "BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment" messages reported by Linus [1], Andy [2], and others. - Move arch-specific shadow ROM location knowledge, e.g., 0xC-0xD, from PCI core to arch code. - Fix the ia64 and MIPS L