On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 08:02:40AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:57:09PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:29:22PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > Commit 5a9d38b20a5a ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt
> > > in intel_bios.c") mo
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:57:09PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:29:22PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Commit 5a9d38b20a5a ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt
in intel_bios.c") moved the workaround for broken or missing VBT to
intel_bios.c. However is_port_va
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 04:29:22PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Commit 5a9d38b20a5a ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt
> in intel_bios.c") moved the workaround for broken or missing VBT to
> intel_bios.c. However is_port_valid() only protects the handling of
> different skus of t
Commit 5a9d38b20a5a ("drm/i915/display: hide workaround for broken vbt
in intel_bios.c") moved the workaround for broken or missing VBT to
intel_bios.c. However is_port_valid() only protects the handling of
different skus of the same display version. Since in
intel_setup_outputs() we share the code
