subject:"\[Intel\-gfx\] \[PATCH v2\] drm\/i915\/guc\: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id"

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-25 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin

On 23/01/16 19:58, yu@intel.com wrote: From: Alex Dai Previously GuC uses ring id as engine id because of same definition. But this is not true since this commit: commit de1add360522c876c25ef2ab1c94bdb509ab Author: Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Fri Jan 15 15:12:50 2016 + drm/i915:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Decouple GuC engine id from ring id

2016-01-23 Thread yu . dai

From: Alex Dai Previously GuC uses ring id as engine id because of same definition. But this is not true since this commit: commit de1add360522c876c25ef2ab1c94bdb509ab Author: Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Fri Jan 15 15:12:50 2016 + drm/i915: Decouple execbuf uAPI from internal implementa